December 2003


Trends and Issues

By Cherilyn G. Murer, JD, CRA


The 15% Inpatient Operating Costs Limitation keeps hospitals within hospitals separate, but related.

The hospital-within-a-hospital (HwH) venue, whereby a separate provider licensed and certified as a hospital in its own right is "co-located" with another, has proven efficient and popular for rehabilitation and long-term acute care hospitals (LTACHs). "Co-location" refers to the fact that the smaller specialty hospital is occupying a portion of the larger, acute care "host" hospital's space, usually through a lease arrangement. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has developed a number of rules to ensure that the HwH is a bona fide separate entity from the host hospital and is not actually a disguised unit. The separateness rule that probably has caused the most confusion for HwH owners is the requirement that no more than 15% of the HwH's inpatient operating costs may be purchased from the host hospital.

The Separate Control Requirement

CMS has long recognized the difference between ownership and control. In CMS's view, separateness is established by control. If the host hospital is not in a position to directly or indirectly control the HwH, then the two hospitals are considered separate. The requirements that CMS has established to ensure separate control of the HwH and host hospital include a requirement that key personnel be separate from those of the host hospital. This means the HwH must have a governing body that is not under the control of the host hospital or a third party that controls both the host hospital and the HwH; and it must have a chief medical officer who is not employed by or under contract with either the host hospital or a third party that controls both hospitals. The HwH governing body must adopt and enforce medical staff bylaws that are separate from those of the host hospital, and that include a process for the HwH to credential its own medical staff separately from the host hospital's credentialing process, and it must have its own CEO who is not employed by, or under contract with, either the host hospital or a third party that controls both hospitals.

CMS's regulations further ensure that the HwH is a separate entity from the host hospital by requiring that the HwH perform "basic" hospital functions itself or through a contract with third parties. These basic functions include quality assurance, medical staff services, nursing services, medical record services, pharmaceutical services, radiologic services, laboratory services, utilization review, and infection control. In the first set of rules governing HwHs that CMS issued in 1994, CMS required that all basic services "except for food and dietetic services and housekeeping, maintenance, and other services necessary to maintain a clean and safe physical environment" must be provided either directly by the HwH or under contract with an entity other than the host hospital.

A difficulty that many providers had with this rule is that some of these "basic" functions could be furnished more cost-effectively if they were performed under a contract with the host hospital. For example, it would not be cost-effective for a relatively small HwH to maintain its own fully equipped laboratory and its own radiological equipment, and it would not be convenient for the HwH's patients if they had to be transported via ambulance to another location for every CT scan or MRI that they required. Thus, the providers argued, the HwH should be able to contract with the host hospital for such services as stat laboratory tests and radiological procedures. As a result of these concerns, the basis function rule now is usually applied only to LTACHs on the campus of a health system.

The 15% Rule

CMS agreed and soon issued new rules that retained the original basic services rule as an option, but added two new options by which the HwH could satisfy the basic services rule. Under one of the new options, the basic services rule would not apply at all if at least 75% of the HwH's patients were referred to it from sources other than the host hospital. Under the other option, the hospital is free to contract with the host hospital for basic services, provided that the cost of the services contracted for with the host hospital "is no more than 15% of the hospital's total inpatient operating costs" (excluding the lease payment). CMS chose the 15% threshold for this option because its data showed that dietetic, housekeeping, and maintenance expenses incurred by HwHs typically ranged from 5% to 17% of all inpatient operating costs.

Because of the cost-effectiveness and patient convenience considerations, the original basic services option is not commonly employed by HwHs. Similarly, because most HwHs receive the bulk of their referrals from the host hospital, the 75% referral option is infrequently employed. Thus, most HwHs choose to comply with what has come to be known as the "15% rule." For these hospitals, the crucial questions then become what "inpatient operating costs" must be allocated toward the 15% threshold and what items and services can be purchased from the host hospital without implicating the 15% rule. Answers to these questions can be found first in the regulations themselves and then in more detail in CMS' Provider Reimbursement Manual. According to the regulation, inpatient operating costs include: operating costs for routine services, such as room, board, and routine nursing services; operating costs for ancillary services, such as radiology and laboratory services furnished to hospital inpatients; and malpractice insurance costs related to services furnished to inpatients. The regulation also states that inpatient operating costs include preadmission services that are diagnostic and that "are furnished in connection with the principal diagnosis that requires the beneficiary to be admitted as an inpatient" but does not include preadmission ambulance services and maintenance renal dialysis.

In its Provider Reimbursement Manual, CMS provides a list of costs that are excluded from a hospital's capital-related costs. As the manual notes, "to the extent that these costs are allowable, they may be included in determining each provider's operating costs." Thus, if a cost is included on the following list, it must be allocated toward the 15% rule in evaluating any contracts for services that the HwH has with the host hospital:
  • "Repair or maintenance of equipment or facilities." Thus, any repair or maintenance agreements with the host hospital would count toward the 15% rule. According to the manual, maintenance agreements constitute operating costs, "even where those agreements provide for the replacement of assets in certain circumstances."
  • "Amounts included in rentals or lease payments for repair or maintenance agreements." Therefore, including the repair or maintenance agreement cost as part of the lease payment does not remove it from the 15% rule.
  • "Interest expense incurred to borrow working capital (for operating expenses)."
  • "General liability insurance or any other form of insurance to provide protection other than for the replacement of depreciable assets or to pay capital-related costs in the case of business interruption." Thus, a real property insurance policy procured from the host hospital would not be considered an operating expense, but general liability and malpractice insurance would count toward the 15% rule.
  • "Taxes other than those assessed on the basis of some valuation of land or depreciable assets used for patient care (taxes not related to patient care, such as income taxes, are not allowable and are, therefore, not included among either capital-related or operating costs)."
  • "The costs of minor equipment that are charged off to expense."
  • "Cleaning services, guard services, and utilities." Note that these are the type of services specifically contemplated by CMS in arriving at the 15% threshold.
  • "Abandoned planning costs." Allowable abandoned planning costs are administrative and general costs and are included in allowable costs either in the year of abandonment or amortized over a 3-year period.
The effect of the 15% rule is that most HwHs will be able to contract with the host hospital for dietetic, housekeeping, and maintenance services, as well as services such as stat laboratory tests, CT scans, and MRIs. Other basic services, such as pharmacy, nursing services, and medical records, must be supplied either directly by the HwH or through a contract with a third party that is not controlled by the host hospital or the hospital system that owns both the host hospital and the HwH. HwH rules should not be viewed as onerous. Rather, the rules have allowed for the condominiumizing of existing buildings, which is in the best interest of public policy. Strict compliance with the federal rules only helps to ensure the long-term viability of the specialty hospital within the hospital venue.®

Cherilyn G. Murer, JD, CRA, is CEO and founder of the Murer Group, a legal-based health care management consulting firm in Joliet, Ill, specializing in strategic analysis and business development. She may be reached at (815) 727-3355 or via the Web: www.murer.com.

MEDIA CENTER

Interactive Media
Resources
Classifieds
Calendar
Consumer Resources
Media Kit
Advertiser Index
EAB
Reprints
Submit an Article

ADDITIONAL ONLINE RESOURCES

Allied Healthcare
Medical Education
24X7mag
Chiropractic Products Magazine
Clinical Lab Products (CLP)
Orthodontic Products
The Hearing Industry Resource
HME Today
Rehab Management
Physical Therapy Products
Plastic Surgery Products
Imaging Economics
Medical Imaging
RT Magazine
Sleep Review
SynerMed Communications
IMED Communications
Practice Growth
Practice Builders
powered by:
Copyright © 2008 Ascend Media LLC | Rehab Management | All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service