February 2002


Pulling the Plug on Pain

By Patrick De Bock, PT

Pulling the plug on Pain

The use of TENS in treating autonomic dysfunction.

The use of electrical stimulation for treating pain is common in physical therapy. Sometimes, it is more efficacious than the use of medications, and it is certainly safer.

Pain treatment is necessary due to many different indications. In the case of autonomic dysfunction, which refers to the sympathetic nervous system and can encompass symptoms such as sweating and cold extremities,1 the symptoms are considered to be part of the pathology that causes the pain. As such, they may have been overlooked as a necessary evil of the pathology. There are, however, effective treatment techniques available. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is believed to be efficacious in treating autonomic dysfunction.2,3

Genesis of Autonomic Dysfunction
The relationship between pain and the autonomic nervous system is complicated. There is some evidence that, in certain pain conditions, the autonomic nervous system becomes involved in the pathology.3-6 Anatomically, there are probably three main neurological categories in which autonomic dysfunction can take place: the central, spinal, and peripheral areas.2,7

The processing of central autonomic activity takes place in the rostral formatio reticularis, cortex, limbic system, cerebellum, hypothalamus, and pituitary gland. The spinal part refers to the so-called "sympathetic reflex" and though the scientific value is not completely understood, in my own observations there is practical evidence for electrotherapy treatment. The peripheral area is the primary place of injury. Long-lasting, painful stimuli in joints and tendons lead to a connection that eventually involves the central and spinal areas.2,7

Electrical stimulation for the treatment of central and peripheral autonomic dysfunction employs microcurrent, but there is also evidence supporting TENS use in treating spinal autonomic dysfunction.1,6 Which way does a painful sensation go before it reaches the brain? Sensation involves the afferent (Aa, Ab, Ad, and C) fibers. The Ad and C fibers are responsible for pain sensations. As soon as these stimuli reach the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, there are three primary results.1-8

First, a connection to the ventral horn provokes a motor response. Second, the brain receives and analyzes the signal in order to characterize the sensation (for example, as sharp, tingling, or dull); to express its intensity (for example, light, moderate, or unbearable); and to determine its source (for example, the knee, hand, or shoulder).

Third, interneurons provide a connection with the nucleus intermediomedialis and nucleus intermediolateralis. These are the spinal sympathetic centers in the lateral horn between C8 and L2. A further connection will be made with the ventral horn in order to reach the sympathetic chain; this will eventually route the noxious stimuli to organs, sweat glands, and the muscles of the arteries.

Clinical Findings
The involvement of the autonomic nervous system in a pathological condition is probably undetectable through diagnostic testing and is not usually detected during clinical examination. Nevertheless, there are three clues to its presence: chronic pain; the symptoms noted during a thorough clinical examination; and certain well-known pathologies, such as reflex sympathetic dystrophy, adhesive capsulitis, chronic tendinitis, whiplash, and (perhaps) fibromyalgia.1,4-11

If pain has been present for weeks or months, it is almost certain that the continued afferent activity of the Ad and C fibers will have caused peripheral, spinal, and central involvement. A good clinical examination will reveal symptoms that might otherwise be overlooked. The following symptoms sometimes indicate autonomic involvement:

  • the skin shows cyanotic color, sweating, sensitivity, and decreased capillary refilling;
  • the muscles show increased volume and tonus, resistance to stretching, and decreased force;
  • the joints show resistance to passive motion, stiffness, and decreased range of motion;
  • the periosteum shows sensitivity; and
  • the nerves show pain during traction tests and are sensitive to palpation.

Purpose of treatment
The use of TENS in the treatment of spinal autonomic dysfunction is based on the gate-control theory of Melzack and Wall.12 If selected stimuli, delivered to the large afferent (Aa, Ab, and some Ad) fibers, can close the gate, there might as well be no connection to the lateral horn.6,13 This explanation sounds hypothetical, but it is sometimes easy to show a positive effect in practice. For example, in reflex sympathetic dystrophy of the hand, a decrease in sweating is seen when a TENS unit, with its parameters set correctly,14 is operating.

Some parameter settings will be obvious when the gate-control technique is being used to control pain14 and other symptoms of autonomic dysfunction.6 Particular attention may be called for in determining electrode placement, treatment time, and intensity.


Table 1. Differences between somatic and autonomic innervation. Parentheses indicate that the innervation level can differ a little from person to person.1
There is some evidence to support treating symptoms using a two-channel technique. Channel 1 has two electrodes; these are placed above and below the spinous process corresponding to the somatic innervation level. According to the literature,1,2,6 there seems to be another innervation level: the autonomic one. Channel 2, therefore, has two electrodes, which are placed above and below the spinous process corresponding to the autonomic innervation level. These innervation levels are indicated in Table 1.

The treatment of autonomic dysfunction takes time, but leaving the TENS unit on for hours will almost certainly cause adaptation. This, in turn, may cause the treatment to have little or no effect. To prevent adaptation, turning the TENS unit on for 20 minutes and then off for 40 minutes is recommended. This sequence can be repeated all day long. At night, it is best to leave the unit off so that the skin will have an opportunity to recover. It is not possible to control the intensity of treatment during sleep, in any case.14

Intensity (current) is a very important parameter because too high a setting may cause the release of endorphins, which is highly discouraged.6 On the other hand, if the intensity is too low, there will probably be no effect at all. The best results are obtained using a setting that causes a moderate degree of sensation (slightly above motor level).2,6,8

Conclusion
In the literature,2,5,6 there seems to be evidence for a relationship between pain and the sympathetic nervous system that leads to autonomic dysfunction. The mechanism involved is not fully understood,9 but a decrease in symptoms is easily shown in some patients treated using TENS. The effects of TENS are achieved by applying the gate-control theory of pain, using the parameter settings6,13-15 shown in Table 2.


Table 2. Settings used to apply the gate-control theory.
Treatment is to be continued until symptoms no longer reappear. TENS is used as an adjunct to concurrent treatment, such as joint mobilization or exercise therapy, for the patient's specific condition. A daily check, conducted in order to determine whether symptoms decrease after a few minutes of treatment, is necessary. If signs of adaptation are seen, it is best to stop treatment for about 48 hours. After this pause, it is usually possible to restart treatment.14

References
1. Van Cranenburgh B. Segmentale Verschijnselen. Antwerp, Belgium: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema; 1987.
2 Koel G. Transcutane Elektrische Neuro Stimulatie. Lochem, Netherlands: Uitgeverij de Tijdstroom; 1991.
3. Sato A, Schmidt R. Somatosympathetic reflexes: afferent fibers, central pathways, discharge characteristics. Physiol Rev. 1973;53:916-947.
4. Bernards A. De relatie tussen het orthosympathisch zenuwstelsel en pijn. In: Voorhoeve P, ed. Pijninformatorium. Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands: Stafleu Samsom; 1992.
5. Hagenaars L, Dekker L, van der Plaats J, Bernards A, Oostendorp R. Effecten van het ortho-sympathisch zenuwstelsel op de dwarsgestreepte spier. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Fysiotherapie. 1985:77-88.
6. Van Zutphen H. Elektrotherapie ter bestrijding van pijn en vegetatieve stoornissen. In: Nederlands Leerboek der Fysische Therapie in Engere Zin. Utrecht, Netherlands: Wetenschappelijke Uitgeverij Bunge; 1991.
7. Pauly N. De interactie van het orthosympathisch zenuwstelsel op nociceptie en pijn. Tijdschrift voor Fysische Therapie. 1999:18-26.
8. Oostendorp R. Functionele Basilaire Insufficiëntie. Nijmegen, Netherlands: Academisch Proefschrift; 1988.
9. Hardy M, Hardy P. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy: the clinician's perspective. J Hand Ther. 1997;10:137-149.
10. Mink A. Extremiteiten, Functieonderzoek en Manuele Therapie. Antwerp, Belgium: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema; 1990.
11. Müller L, Rittmeister M, John J, Happ J, Kerschbaumer F. Frozen shoulder: an algoneurodystrophic process? Acta Orthop Belg. 1998;64:434-440.
12. Melzack R, Wall P. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science. 1965;150:171-179.
13. Bernards A. Fysiologie en pathofysiologie van nocisensoriek. In: Nederlands Leerboek der Fysische Therapie in Engere Zin. Utrecht, Netherlands: Wetenschappelijke Uitgeverij Bunge; 1991.
14. DeBock P. European perspective: a comparison between TENS and MET. Physical Therapy Products. 2000;11:28-33.
15. Howson D. Peripheral neural excitability, implications for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Phys Ther. 1978;58:1467-1473.

Patrick De Bock, PT, works in the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium, where he is responsible for the technical examination of spine and upper/lower limb injuries. He also has a small manual therapy private practice and teaches physical therapists on the use of electrotherapy in treating pain.

MEDIA CENTER

Interactive Media
Resources
Classifieds
Calendar
Consumer Resources
Media Kit
Advertiser Index
EAB
Reprints
Submit an Article

ADDITIONAL ONLINE RESOURCES

Allied Healthcare
Medical Education
24X7mag
Chiropractic Products Magazine
Clinical Lab Products (CLP)
Orthodontic Products
The Hearing Industry Resource
HME Today
Rehab Management
Physical Therapy Products
Plastic Surgery Products
Imaging Economics
Medical Imaging
RT Magazine
Sleep Review
SynerMed Communications
IMED Communications
Practice Growth
Practice Builders
powered by:
Copyright © 2009 Ascend Media LLC | Rehab Management | All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service